The Life and Death of James Dean
Wednesday, October 31st, 2007Watch it here.
ITP Class Blogs
Watch it here.
Hughes’ basic point is this: the best new media projects come out of small teams (sometimes of just one) where people have a clear vision of the goal and are empowered and self-motivated to achieve it.
Environments that are likely to produce good software:
Environments that are unlikely to produce good software:
The very best software:
On the other hand, software pitfalls to avoid include:
I would recommend this book to anyone who works in a creative field or manages people who produce creative output. I’d recommend the first half of the book to anyone who is interested in the history of the computer as a medium.
Hughes’ enthusiasm is contagious. I’m excited to explore many of the works he references, including Romain Victor-Pujebet’s Lulu. Hughes also renewed my interest in designer/writer Donald Norman. I think I’ll go back and re-read The Design of Everyday Things — more on that later.
So, we ordered all kinds of balls online. We got glass marbles, rubber bouncy balls, wooden balls, and ping pong balls. And then we hit up Home Depot. I had a gift certificate that I’d been waiting to use on my next big project.
We went through Home Depot by feel and ended up in the plumbing section. We built a prototype for the basic structure right there in the store, much to the amusement of the guys working there. I think plumbing pieces were a good choice because they’re modular, standardized, sturdy… and plus, they look cool.
In addition to the plumbing supplies, we got four funnels to hold the balls, and two hard-hats, just for fun.
Back in the shop, we rescued some unclaimed plexi and put our names on it. Then we assembled the whole pipe structure on top of its pole. Right now, Soundball is feeling very tall, and very top-heavy.
Now that all the balls have arrived, we can start constructing the sorter. We wanted to wait until we had their exact diameters and total volumes. We plan to work on the sorter on Tuesday night. It wouldn’t be a bad time to work on the bowl/catcher, either.
Meanwhile, we’ve got serious things to think about:
The audio is excerpted from public radio show This American Life, episode 218 (entitled Act V). It’s about a group of high-security prisoners getting ready to perform the fifth and last act of Hamlet.
I’ve called it Hamlets because the role of Hamlet is split among four prisoners, one of whom appears in this clip.
Go ahead, watch it.
The idea is to use small, strong magnets to make beads that kids can arrange into necklaces and bracelets. Like pop beads, they should be fun to put together, fun to pull apart, and different enough to allow kids to create their own patterns.
I immediately whispered the idea to Mandy and she agreed we should work together and start ordering rare earth magnets.
The magnets arrived today, and preliminary testing is very promising. They are definitely going to hold enough to support their own weight, along with some kind of decorative casing (which will make them prettier and also easier to stick together end-to-end than side-to-side).
And if my experience with them is any indication, kids are going to have a lot of fun with the feel of putting these magnets together, taking them apart, and enjoying the sensation of objects held together around your body by the mysterious, invisible force of magnetism.
Don’t Trust the Media
In a competitive parenting environment, parents are willing to try anything that will give their kids a leg up. Parental money fuels the multi-billion dollar business of screen-based toys, videos, and educational aids.
But on the other hand, recent scientific studies have posited a link between screen time and ADHD, autism, and obesity. Like many parents, the author felt both ashamed and indignant in 1999 when the AAP put the kabosh on screen time for kids under 2.
So which is it? Are TV and videos good for kids, or bad for them? Toy marketing and oversimplified press make parents feel like their instincts are all wrong.
When it comes down to it, you can’t force a child to think beyond her level of cognitive development. But you can challenge her, keeping her just outside the zone of proximal development, where learning happens.
The latest greatest product is not the cure-all that will turn her into a baby Einstein or Mozart. Kids need all kinds of stimulation, and media – educational or not – is just one piece of the pie.
Kids’ TV is Fine for Kids
With certain caveats, it turns out that kids’ television and videos are just fine for kids. Good television – like Blue’s Clues, Dora the Explorer, and Sesame Street – have been shown to help children learn (158). As long as they’re paying attention, children are picking something up: “young children watch television because they are cognitively engaged in it (34).”
Like rats in enriched or impoverished cages, kids learn more when there’s more available to challenge them. A television show like Sesame Street really does expose children to stories, ideas, people and places they’ve never seen before.
The most effective programming invites participation and takes the child’s developmental level into account. Younger kids do better with clear, linear story lines. Kids also learn better with repetition (124).
But, like I said, there are caveats:
Kids Need a Balanced Diet
Lisa Guernsey’s concludes that screen time is okay for kids, in moderation. Parents should choose media based on the child’s developmental level. They should start dialogues with kids about what they’re watching or reinforce what they’ve learned from a particular show.
Children under five need lots of interaction: read to them, talk to them, and describe things going on around you.
And finally, let them do their own thing. Children need time for creative, open-ended play. When they’re playing, kids act out and self-reinforce all the things they’re learning.
Physical Process
I’ve spent the last few years learning to cook, standardizing my favorite dishes, and writing them down as recipes on my computer. For this project, I’ve taken those recipes and made them into notecards in a recipe box. So the artwork I’m reproducing is actually a re-reproduction: from food, to computer file, back to a physical form.
I dyed each notecard with coffee to create an aged appearance, hung it to dry on a clothesline, and ironed it to flatten it. Then I copied my recipes onto notecards, added drawings and notes, and placed them in alphabetical order in the box.
I dripped food (where possible, appropriate to the recipe) on specific notecards for verisimilitude. I aged the box by filing the edges and throwing it around a little.
Thought Process
I always wanted a feminine education I never got. More specifically, I wanted to learn the arts of the kitchen. My mother, although armed with a recipe box handed down from her own mother, hates to cook.
In addition to a relaxing hobby, I see cooking as a way of nourishing and pleasing my family, my friends, and myself. Although I distrust such seemingly anti-feminist sentiments, it means a lot to me when a friend stops by and eats my leftovers rather than picking up a slice of pizza.
It was important to me not just to create this object, but to pass down the recipe box and the information it contains. I’ve chosen a female friend in this class who has lost her mother. From the first moment, I created this object with her in mind.
Class Concept: the Aura of Originality
I’m counting on the idea of the aura as described by Walter Benjamin. The recipe box is an authentic, unique original. The recipes, my handwriting, and especially my notes and drawings communicate a part of me. I hope that the time and energy I spent on it have infused it with something like aura. More precisely, I’ve put love and accumulated knowledge into these recipes and their physical manifestation. I want their new owner to feel that love.
On the other hand, I’ve constructed a functional object, not a fetishist symbol like the artworks described by Benjamin. I hope that my friend will actually try out the recipes in the recipe box. Although each iteration of a recipe is in a certain way a dimmer copy of a delicious, Platonic original set down at the time the recipe was written, it’s also different and original each time. Unlike a postcard of the Mona Lisa, a favorite meal cooked after you’ve had a chance to miss it loses none of its aura. If anything, the dish becomes more nostalgic and comforting with each reproduction or reworking. And like Benjamin, I’m comforted by the fact that new channels of distribution will allow my recipes to meet a larger audience halfway. If someone else cooks or shares a recipe I’ve invented, I’ll reach the people those people serve the meal to, probably without even knowing it.
Class Concept: Reappropriation
I’m also drawing on the idea of reappropriation, taking a mass-produced recipe box, identical blank postcards, and a plain black ballpoint pen, and using them to conjure something much more authentic and personal.
I’m employing reappropriation here more in the style of Sherrie Levine doing Marcel Duchamp than like Duchamp himself. That is, I’ve taken a mass-produced object and altered both its content and its context. Duchamp recontextualized objects mainly by placing them in a new context. His art was as much about the dialogue it unleashed as the physical objects themselves. As proof of their non-art status, many of the readymades managed to fall back into obscurity or into their original uses. But Levine and other artists like her have added new layers of meaning to this process of recontextualization. Her works add both new context, and new content to the objects represented. By pointing to more than one ideology, art criticism, or artwork, the “contingent object” takes on complex and shifting levels of reference and meaning. I’ve altered the card file’s content by supplying it with content (both physical and conceptual), and I’ve also altered its context by declaring its status not as office supply but as art object.
On the other hand, I’m more in line with Duchamp’s method of evoking of mass production. His readymades were serendipitous, almost arbitrary finds. Similarly, when I conceptualized the project, I knew that I wanted to use a card file, it didn’t matter whether its brand was Rubbermaid, 3M, or Staples. In contrast, because she was quoting a specific work with her Fountain, Levine found it meaningful to seek out the specific model of urinal Duchamp had used in his.
Summary
I’ve taken advantage of this assignment to create a personal object for a friend. I’ve imbued it with a lot of care and also with the thoughts and ideologies we’ve been exploring together in class. I hope she likes it.
Here’s the writing prompt. Listen to my response below.