NIME


Shop Admin

ITP Help Pages


rss feed for this site


apple

Syllabus

New Interfaces for Musical Expression

  • Fall 2009 - Tuesdays 6:30-9:00pm
  • Instructor: Greg Shakar and Hans-Christoph Steiner
  • Office Hours: Greg by Appointment, Hans Tuesdays 2-4pm

Assignments and Readings

While the central purpose of this class is to produce and perform an instrument, there are a number of assignments and readings that are also required. These are designed to bring clarity, structure, and inspiration to the process. The assignments and readings are always due the week after they are assigned (i.e. the next class).

Performance Critique

Every week, we will watch a performance then critique it. The central idea is to focus on what is happening in the performance rather than whether we liked it or not. The discussion can cover any topic, the only thing that is not allowed are judgments, like "I liked it", or "that sucked", or "that's a nice guitar sound". Instead people should talk about the music, sound, and performance itself, how the parts all relates to the whole, whether the gestures fit with the sound, etc. This kind of critical listening can be very valuable for developing a keen sense of listening, though it can be a bit difficult to learn at first.

Weekly Progress Journal

Once production is underway, you are expected to keep a weekly journal of what you worked on for your project. This is very close to the journals from Intro to Physical Computing, except that these journal entries will all relate to the same project: your NIME instrument. Some assignments specifically require journal entries. In these cases, entries are to be posted prior to the beginning of the next class.

Performance Plan

Starting on week 9, create your performance plan. The key idea is to map out how your performance will proceed – how it will begin, how it will unfold, and how it will end. This material needs to be handed in to us on paper (place them in Greg Shakar's mailbox at ITP) prior to class on week 12. Use the performance planning strategy that makes the most sense for your piece and for your instrument.

  • a graphic representation of the timeline or event possibilities for you to follow during your performance.
  • a traditionally notated score, or variation on traditional music notation (including devising your own notation scheme for your instrument).
  • a bullet point list describing the sequence of events you want to move through during the performance, articulating particularly the beginning and end.
  • or create your own notion of what a score could be, (as long as you speak to its validity as a performance planning tool).

BE ABLE to close your eyes and walk through your whole performance from pre-beginning to post-end. Rehearse it on the subway train, when you’re walking. The key for each rehearsal, real or imagined, is maintaining continuity. Do not stop or let it be interrupted. It can fast or glacially slow, but it must be continuous.

Grading Criteria:

  • Punctual and regular attendance at class meetings
  • Level of participation in class discussion
  • Quality and timeliness of assignments
  • Ability to collaborate responsibly with other classmates
  • Creativity and inventiveness of final musical instrument prototype

Weeks 1-6: Concept Development

(9/8) Week 1: The Role of Music in Everyday Life

In order to frame the work of the class, this session provides a look at music in everyday life. We look at the meaning that can be created by music, and the ways in which music is ‘used’ by people in ritual, social and identity definition. With the dominance of recorded music, our experience of music is now mostly as a passive listener, rather than as a engaged participant. This is a dramatic change from the origins of music.

Performance Critique: Michael Waisvisz - the Hands, @ NIME'03 in Montreal

(9/15) Week 2: Why Performance Tools?

For millenia, musical instruments were physical devices, whose interfaces and sound generating mechanisms were intertwined; You control a guitar string with your fingers and it directly generates the sound. Now with electronic and computer synthesis, this relationship changes, the interface no longer generates the sound. This opens up the possibilities for design, providing many advantages but also inevitably disadvantages.

Performance Critique: Scribble

  • Assignment
    • "Inspirational Sounds": Think about the music you would aspire to make – and bring a short audio clip of it to share with the class. This can be something you have already done, but we encourage you to look to the work of other artists/musicians/performers for inspiration
  • Readings

(9/22) Week 3: Types of Musical Tools

Types and approaches to New Interfaces for Musical Expression. An example-based look at the lineage of musical interfaces from acoustic to electronic systems, as well as some examples of interesting NIME projects.

Performance Critique: Mouse on Mars - Twift Shoeblade

  • Assignment
    • "Inspirational Actions": Think about a performance you have witnessed that made a indelible mark in your life, a performance you would aspire to give, a tool/system you would aspire to perform – and bring a short audio and/or video clip of it to share with the class. This can be something you have already done, but we encourage you to look to the work of other artists/musicians/performers for inspiration.
  • Readings
    • Unpublished interview with Bill Verplank, Center for the Computer Research and Acoustics (CCRMA) at Stanford BillVerplankPRIMER.pdf

(9/29) Week 4: Musical Interface as Interaction Design Challenge

We look at the larger ‘problem’ of human computer interaction design, set in the context of the history of human factors engineering. We consider Bill Verplank’s progression of design systems that better factor in human participation from making them safe to effective to efficient to satisfying. We then look at the special challenges of musical interface design, and the difference between “button” and “handle” controls.

Performance Critique: Wheel Experience - Younnat

  • Assignment
    • Concept Presentations for group 1

(10/6) Week 5: Concept Presentations 1

This class is devoted to 1/2 of the classes’ concept presentations. Students in the class present the idea they will be implementing during the term. Each presentation will be limited to 15 minutes.

Performance Critique: Effet Papillon - Mylene Benoit / Cie Contour Progressif

  • Assignment
    • Concept Presentations for group 2

(10/13) Week 6: Concept Presentations 2

This class is devoted to 1/2 of the classes’ concept presentations. Students in the class present the idea they will be implementing during the term. Each presentation will be limited to 15 minutes.

Performance Critique: Daedelus - Live in San Antonio - Outtro (local mirror)

  • Assignment
    • Weekly progress journal entry

Weeks 7-11: Prototype Development

(10/20) Week 7: Responding to Concepts / Pd

After hearing the class presentations from the last two weeks, the instructors respond to the ideas, with case studies of similar directions, different approaches to implementation. How to use Pd for creating, reading, writing, and remixing sound

Guest Presentation: Action Potential - Torino|Margolis with Lee Azzarello and Dana Kolter

  • Assignment
    • Weekly progress journal entry

(10/27) Week 8: Physical Computing for NIME

Physical computing methods for getting the full potential out of sensors and responsive outputs from electronics.

Performance Critique: artificiel cubing, performance with Rubik's Cubes (video)

(11/3) Week 9: Studio Class – Performance Planning

There are many methodologies, documentation frameworks and notations musicians and performers use to prepare their pieces. These ideas speak to the intention, context and at times political motivation of the performer. Using examples from artists who thought a great deal about the meaning of their performance frameworks, we will devise our own approaches for our NIME instruments.

Performance Critique: reacTable: improvisation demo

  • Assignment
    • Weekly progress journal entry
    • Performance Plan / Composition Assignment
    • Prototype Presentations for group 1

(11/10) Week 10: Prototype Presentations 1

In this class, students will give presentations of their musical interface prototypes, in a forum for class/instructor evaluation and feedback. Half of the class will present this week.

Performance Critique:

  • Assignment
    • Weekly progress journal entry
    • Prototype Presentations for group 2

(11/17) Week 11: Prototype Presentations 2

In this class, students will give presentations of their musical interface prototypes, in a forum for class/instructor evaluation and feedback. The other half of the class will present this week.

Performance Critique: vienna vegetable orchestra

  • Assignment
    • Weekly progress journal entry

Weeks 12-14: Build It!

(11/24) Week 12: Workshop

Full class workshop, details TBD.

(12/1) Week 13: Workshop

Full class workshop, details TBD.

Week 14: Full Day Rehearsal (we will choose a date)

All NIME projects are required to be on the ITP floor during this period. We will review each project, assess all staging and technical requirements for the performance, and gather information to generate the running order for the final show. NOTE: You can have your project anywhere you want on the floor - it must be functioning and making sound. We will do a full run-through of concert. Pizza will be served at the end.

MANDATORY PERFORMANCE AT PUBLIC VENUE

Tentative date, to be confirmed. It will be around the same time as the ITP show, so before making holiday travel plans, be sure that you know the date of the performance.

  Edit | View | History | Print | Recent Changes | Search Page last modified on November 10, 2009, at 03:07 PM