Agenda

Session 1: Intro session -- Tom

• Themes in papers, 45 mins
  • We present the themes from papers and summarize
• Identifying exercise, 45 minutes
  1. We pre-cluster the groups, 1 from each theme
  2. We assign the same concepts across all groups
  3. Lay out universe of concepts related to this field (start with Allison's cards) Use different ones than Allison
  4. Everyone mark the cards as expert/aware/ignorant
  5. Experts give 2-minute summaries of least-known topics

Session 2: Grand vision discussion

• Priorities voting
  1. Same groups, each person votes on priority weight for each item
  2. Vote along three lines: world, ubicomp, you.
  3. You get 100 points for each voting line. Distribute.
  4. At the end, we tally world and ubicomp numbers. Each person tallies their own you.
• Group action vs. individual action

	Groups: industrial, regulatory, commercial, political, etc.

• Develop roadmap of evolutionary thinking
  • what's being done?
  • what models do people understand things as?
  • what's missing?
• group vs individual culpability
• energy - quality or efficiency?
• What about other ideas? Jen? Jay?

     [Hasbrouck, Jay] Green movement counterculture shift to green networking

Set social context

     [Jen] How do we see to it that all the good stuff in the second session is captured for session 4?

Big markers are good, so stuff is readable across the room

Session 3: old tech

• Dead/Dying/Disabled ethno-exercise (30 mins; Jay to fill this

in with an exercise)

     [Hasbrouck, Jay]  Cover tech eco-cycle. Dead/Dying/Disabled exercise on re-use, re-purposing, recycling

From Jay:

• Present some of Jay/Allison's data
  • Pictures, Profile, map, diagram of technical system in home, list of D/D/D technologies in their home
• Break into groups, have the groups come up with strategies for this home
• re-group as a whole, discuss and critique

Session 4: Pragmatist exercise

1. Specify problems from Session 2
2. Take each problem and identify an ideal outcome
3. Identify steps to reach outcome. Note sub-problems and roadblocks, and what you need to learn along the way.

     [Hasbrouck, Jay] What happens if we do nothing in the particular spaces your project

addresses?

• (need to identify relevant spaces projects intersect) such as monitoring
• (energy use, air quality, old tech, education, infrastructure)

---

Old version of session 3.

• Design exercise: Pick one or the other
  • Design a
    • mote that'll still be being paid attention toin 25 years
    • phone that'll still be in your pocket in 25 years
    • printer that'll still be on your desk in 25 years
  • Tell the future history of a current device and its environmental/ physical effects
  • [Jen] Re-design a device using the values discusses in this workshop as a basis
• What is the anti-ideal? Worst case scenario?