Archives for posts with tag: 2dDesign

Color is so important and so easy to dismiss. It was nice to get the chance to take a closer look at it this week in 2D.

Initially I wanted to play with using a magnifying lens to just see transparency, but I forgot the difference that borders make:

 

See what I mean? This image may not have been as fun but it created a better illusion of transparency (just by changing saturation levels).

 

And then I had a little fun with shapes and monochrome colors.

 

And I had even more fun with complements.

 

I think my kindergarten teacher would be proud to see how far I’ve come.

Creating a logo in a week for the program that you are enrolled in is a bit of a daunting task. And if anything, the fact that the program in question is  ITP  only makes the task that much harder. I mean, come on…I have trouble defining ITP myself. Our full name (Interactive Telecommunications Program) doesn’t provide any sort of hint at the stuff that we actually do up on the 4th floor of Tisch. And though the official website describes ITP as “A Center for the Recently Possible”, that doesn’t really translate into an explanatory definition, let alone a centralized idea for a logo.

So I spent a lot of time brainstorming.  Here are some of my failures, or the ideas that I ended up abandoning (all rough drafts, mind you). I should also mention that by the time I got to Illustrator I already had a notebook page full of sketches. I opted not to scan and upload that, so what you’re getting is just a small piece of the thought process:

 

 

This was where I started. I wanted to go for something that was reminiscent of building things from scratch, hence the wood-like design of the letters. But despite the ruggedness of building ideas,  I wanted the block letters to bring an official feel to things, since ITP is part of an academic research university, after all.

A sandpaper-rough draft of my thoughts around playing with “ITP”  in a lightbulb, to signify the creativity that is such a large part of ITP culture. I dismissed it pretty quickly as too literal. Plus, with all the issues around centricity that I brought up earlier, I thought it might be wise to stay away from an icon.

It was then that the “T” really started to bother me (just as our professor had warned us it might).  So I decided to explore the idea of something handwritten in a way that could possibly break down the issue with the T just chilling in the center, taking up emphasis:

I wasn’t completely satisfied, but I felt like I was on the right track.

You can see where the rest of the track led me:

 

And finally, a little smoothed out and in purple (NYU color) and black:

 

 

Note: this is still,as many of my 2D Design assignments are, a bit of a work in process. You can see how though all of the logos above are similar, I was still playing around with the “t” bar height and the drag on the “p” descender. The two on the bottom are a bit rougher.)

I ended up really liking the design. It’s simple, which I love, and it gets across  a feel for scrawling out ideas–like the brainstorming that leads to a creative moment. At the same time, the cursive really lets the “t” and “p” balance each other out and lends a little more substance and authority then it would have if it was a more full-bodied type of lettering.

It’s still a rough draft because I think it needs some smoothing and a bit more attention to detail, but it’s my logo design contribution for this little educational explorational endeavor that we’ve got going on here.

Well, that or this:


In my 2D Design class last week we focused on logos, the defining and representative mark of a company or brand. As part of our homework wewere charged to choose a logo that we like and think is successful and explain, well, why.

It took me all of five seconds to figure out what logo I wanted to cover. I wanted a logo that is everywhere, that everyone recognizes and utilizes and even customizes. I wanted a logo that is so prevalent allaround me that the mere sight of it causes me to shake my head in a complicated mix of annoyance and appreciation.

This is what I’m talking about, folks:

 

 

It’s big. It’s loud. It’s noticeable. It’s all uppercase. Six letters, well-kerned and enclosed within two heavy red blocks so as to be even MORE in-your-face.

And that’s exactly why I like it. It is the simplest logo out there but it sends a huge message. It may not tell you what Run DMC means exactly, but it does communicates that whatever it is, it’s a big deal.* It’s makes no assumptions, gives no clue as to what its about, but it makes you want to know more. It’s timeless in its simplicity, and it’s brazen in a way that isn’t jarring. And in the time that Run DMC was trying to make a name, it provided exactly what they needed.

And I guess that’s what makes it so successful. That and the fact that everyone and their mom has found a way to customize it.

Even things that don’t quite fit the theme have been stuffed into this logo design:

 

Personally, this one’s my favorite:

 

I think some might claim that if a logo is that simple as to be so readily imitated, it could be a bad thing. But I think that every one of these logo customizations only hearkens back to the original and reminds you of where it came from. In a sense, each imitation creates more publicity for Run DMC. After all, all those people chose to build off of the original Run DMC logo for a reason: namely, because it works. It’s striking and simple and it works. What more can you ask for?

 

[Other than this, I mean].

 

*And really, Run DMC is a pretty big deal. As in, first-rap-act-to-have-a-#1-R&B-charting-rap-album and these-guys-were-instrumental-in-making-hip-hop-mainstream sort of big deal. Whatever your feelings on the genre, you can’t argue that Run DMC were quite large in terms of historical impact.See here for more details.

 

EDIT: Completely unrelated, but also a cool logo here.

An idea that I came up with for a business card. Consider this a sketch of sorts. Idea is to convey some sort of seriousness and elegance with the front (with the use of my first name on it) and then flip things up for the back. I wanted to use a different font for the back but I couldn’t get the download to work properly.

 

 

             

 

The “Mimi” part would be in different colors on different cards, just to spice it up a little.

The fact that we use signs every day of our life as a means to gather and communicate information apparently does not exclude tons of them from being nonsensical, unclear, or just plain messed up. Don’t believe me? See proof below.

Example 1.)  Established institution establishes itself as bad at spelling.

Example 2.)  From the ITP building, of all places. It’s hard to read, but there’s caution tape blocking people from walking into the door. The sign that’s posted there has an arrow pointing to the right that says, “Please Use This Door”, but it’s pointing at…a window.

 

Example 3.) I didn’t mean to touch on potentially sensitive subject matter, but this was a sign that I saw in Harlem awhile ago. This church managed to get their message across, but syntax was sacrificed in the effort.