Shinyoung made a mold and produced a total of 10 static models of Dust to display at the ITP Spring Show.
I also realized that we need a better way to connect the audio output of the Coby MP3 player to the Dust circuit board. For the breadboard, we connected a 1/8" mini phone plug from the output of the MP3 player into the input of the amplifier section.
I want to remove the headphone jack from the MP3 player for our smaller prototype in order to eliminate the bulky plug.
Time for surgery again.
After poking around for awhile with a multimeter to try to figure out how the jack was wired, I gave up and focused my efforts on freeing the SMD jack from the MP3 player's board. It was easier to diagnose the wiring of the jack once it was off the boad.
Since I was tired, I soldered the wires on the wrong side of the board at first (wasn't paying attention to the orientation of the USB pins I soldered on earlier in the day).
In order to reduce the size of the new Dust prototype, I am further hacking apart the Coby MP3 player. I bought an SMD mini USB connector from Digikey to attach to the printed circuit board. My plan is to replace the USB connector on the Coby unit with four male headers which will plug into the main Dust board. It was very confusing to make sense of the USB pinout. The mini connector has 5 pins, but the original large USB connector has four pins.
In the process of coaxing the original USB connector out, I damaged one of the vias and pads on the Coby board. I hope the damage isn't permanent. You can see the lifted pad right below the "B1" label (upside down)
I tried to repair the lifted trace and pulled out pad with a short section of wrapping wire.
Notice the wrapping wire soldered onto the end of a male header pin. The next trick is to solder the stripped end of the wrapping wire to the lifted circuit trace. I applied superglue to the bottom of the trace to hold it down and then scraped its surface to expose the copper.
I'll won't know if the repair was successful until I get the MP3 player attached to the main Dust circuit board. I'm still a little concerned that the USB wires going between the boards need to be shielded.
I finished another revision of the Dust protoype schematic.
Changes from the last version include:
I also finished the first "real" version of the board layout.
It will be a double-sided board with handmade vias in several spots. There was a point yesterday evening when I just couldn't deal with the complexity of routing things on one side of the board only. I asked Rob Faludi to help me figure out how to add "vias" properly. The whole trick with the vias in Eagle is using the Ratsnest command, which redraws the screen and apparently recomputes connections.
Based on advice from a tutorial I found on Instructables, I drew registration marks on the top and bottom of the board layouts so I can align them perfectly before I iron the toner onto my copper clad board.
Next, I printed out the board to see how things would fit.
Next Steps
This reminds me of the story of the gingerbread man -- you know, he ran as fast as he could... but still ended up in the oven.
We started out with two halves joined together, but then realized that our presentation model should incorporate some of the circuitry. We cut out a door in the back to hold the speaker, LEDS, and vibrating motor.
Polymer clay (in this case SculpeyPremo) bakes for 25 minutes at 275° (or close to it).
After baking, the surface looks more matte.
Work continues on the schematic for Dust. I have spent hours in Eagle drawing this thing.

Design Questions:
I also started creating a PCB design. I want to print it out this afternoon to see the physical size and see if this corresponds with the size we want to make the wearable item.
For the past two days I've been building up the Dust prototype circuit.
So far I've gotten away with entirely found parts... This is fine for the breadboard, but for our final wearable version, we'll need to reduce the size significantly.
Remaining tasks:
I tried again to make another cable prototype yesterday afternoon.
Applying the First Shield Layer

Applying the Second Shield Layer

My sewing was not entirely straight, so I'm not sure how well the prototype will carry audio signals. There may even be shorts between the layers. My next step is to test the "cable" with an audio signal. I want to try the wearable cable with a microphone to see how much noise my homemade cable produces. I also need to terminate the shield and signal wires with rings so I can solder wires or other connectors to them.
I've had another idea about how to make the cables: if I use wider strips of conductive fabric, I could make piping with a stitch of conductive thread down the middle. This would be easier to construct than my second prototype.
I've discovered that three layers of fabric and the associated stitching produce a fairly stiff package. I'm not sure if this will work well for creating curved "wire" paths in clothing.
Kelly taught me the basics of machine sewing this afternoon. Thanks for your patience, dear... I wasn't the most model student. We discussed properly squaring up the fabric, threading the machine, and guiding the fabric.
I'm trying to create wearable audio cables which are a component of final project.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
The result of my first experiment was not so successful. The machine seemed to choke on the conductive thread, even though I was feeding it from the bobbin (sp?).
I found this lovely little item at the Family Dollar for $5. Coupled with a pair of pants for $3.75, I think I have the makings of a pair of percussion pants.
I found that Steve Mann's article responded to some of the issues raised in Frank Webster's Theories of the Information Society with regard to surveillance as an important information gathering tool of the "scientific management" mindset of our corporate and governmental systems. Mirroring Webster's desire to understand the impact of information technology (primarily in the form of information gathering) on the regulation of current society, Mann wants to question the claim that surveillance will lead to a "better future" (Mann 94).
What I found fascinating about the article was that Mann's experiments in "Reflectionism," relied upon his "clothing" and the identity he created with it. It seems that the experiments he undertook would not have been so directly provocative if he simply visited establishments wearing "normal" clothes and carrying a video camera. By using the personally expressive power of his clothing, he literally wore his attitude "on his sleeve." This was especially subversive in the context of our discussion of wearables because unlike a handheld technical accessory, his imaging and data transmission system was deeply embedded in the garments he was wearing. He mirrors the use of built-in video surveillance as a new "prosthetic territory" of architecture (Mann 95) by his total integration of the equiment into his identity, even going so far as to insist on his "self+prosethetic device" (Mann 101) identity on official documentation.
"'Reflectionism' and 'Diffusionism': New Tactics for Deconstructing the Video Surveillance Superhighway"
Steve Mann
Leonardo, Vol. 31 No. 2. (1998), pp.93-102
Fashion by Georg Simmel, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol 62, No. 6 (may, 1957), pp. 541-558
Georg Simmel explores at great length the dynamics of fashion, commenting on the affect of class distinction and economic progress on the transitory nature of the sociological phenomenon.
Quotes that stood out:
Thus fashion represents nothing more than one of the many forms of life by the aid of which we seek to combine in uniform spheres of activity the tendency towards social equalization with the desire for individual differentiation and change.
[Fashion] has overstepped the bounds of its original domain, which comprised only personal externals, and has acquired an increasing influence over taste, over theoretical convictions, and even over the moral foundations of life.- I think this has increased beyond what Simmel observed in 1957. The television and more recently the internet have accelerated this consumeristic trend.
We are asked to create a personal "Venus of Willendorf". The operative idea behind this is exploring the possibility of expression through a personal object.
I have chosen to "embody" myself in a small, pocket-sized ball which serves both as a Rosary and as a reminder of the committment Kelly and I share in our marriage. We are bound together by agreement, but more than that by the grace of God.
The two-toned ball has ten "flowers" on it which correspond to the ten beads on a Rosary. The juxtaposition of the Rosary with the reminder of our marital committment is also a reminder to continually pray for grace in our marriage.