A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

CLick here to expand all course descriptions

Posts by (1)

Cradle to Cradle

Remaking the Way We Make Things

Since the other student who read the book addressed the connect of “waste = food” and recycling vs up cycling, I will focus on the argument “respect diversity”.

The industrial revolution brought about many great advances in technology. We became more “efficient” at producing food and other consumer products, as well as transporting these products across the globe. The industrial revolution also brought about an extreme paradigm shift; Man, rather than working within the constraints of his surroundings, began to just add more power to overcome, conquer, and remove themselves from the natural system.

On a separate but related note, I watched a PBS documentary on the Dust Bowl this weekend. An interview one of the farmers sons that was interviewed stood out. He stated that they never “tried different”, they just “tried harder”. If the price of wheat plummeted, they just tilled more land and tried to sell more at the cheaper price. When the dust bowl hit, they didn’t try anything new, or look to old methods even, they just added more power in hopes that it would achieve a different result that year. Not only had they creates huge stretches of land with a monoculture landscape, they also killed off the natural predator, the coyote. This lead to an infestation of jackrabbits, who ate every inch of vegetation that was still left, compounding the problem further.

They did not respect ecological diversity, or ecological history of the location they cultivated. Not only did the farmers of the Midwest wipe out a series of very different ecosystems on the grassy plains, but they replaced it with a one size fits all solution: more powerful machines, and miles of monoculture wheat.

Man has also taken this same approach to making buildings. Rather than using materials and labor that compliments the culture and the location, we now ship in prefabricated parts made of materials from thousands of miles away. These parts may rust in the salt air, or degrade in the hot sun, so we slap some paint on it and slap on a bigger air-conditioning unit. We are hell bent on locking nature out.

So thats what not to do. McDonough and Braungart propose that instead of a monoculture solution that is simply made more powerful to overcome a diversity of problems, let us look to local and diverse solutions to solve different local problems.

In respect to the Dust Bowl example, they should have looked at what was growing there before we showed up: buffalo grass. A lot of the area was perfectly suited for grazing cattle. The roots of this grass kept the topsoil secure even in times of extreme drought. By all means, grow the wheat too, but take into account that an incredibly diverse and complicated ecosystem developed before we got there, and we should not only respect it, but look to it for solutions to problems . (I’m not going to go any further into this example since it was a side note to begin with).

As for buildings, commercial or residential, we should take cues from the local culture and environment, as well as considering future uses. The book mentions that in India, porous walls of wet sandstone serve as a way of cooling the air naturally as it blows through the building. Fresh cool air, no electricity needed, and its definitely nicer to look at than an airtight concrete box with a huge AC unit on the side. Add photovoltaic cells to roofs in areas with strong sun. Add green roofs to buildings in areas with seasonal temperature changes to help keep the building warmer/cooler than outside while creating a green space which if not only aesthetically pleasing but helps manage storm water runoff. Chicago is the Windy City. Why not explore wind power options?

We need localize solutions to both local and global problems, which take into account the history as well as it’s future lifecycle, wheather it be an ecosystem, a building, or a product.

2 comments to Cradle to Cradle

  • Nancy

    Great questions, Katie… And a very good take on the book. So, how would you go about getting this word out. getting people to re-think how they solve huge environmental problems.
    You should talk sometime to Despina Papapdopoulos… she speaks to this quite eloquently, as does Tom Igoe.

  • Kathryn "Adee"

    Hi Nancy, sorry i’m just getting to this now. I will be sure to talk with Despina and Tom sometime.

    As for getting the word out, I think people are generally reactive, rather than proactive. Corporations need to realize it’s more profitable to take care of their people and planet (not an easy pitch). The more case studies we have to reference, the easier the argument becomes. As for the masses, I think we need to trick them with trends and attractive design whenever possible.