Skip to content

Quick Reflection: w/ Craig Protzel

After resubmitting my thesis proposal, Craig also gave me a lot of helpful responses,

  1. Should keep thinking about the intention of my project, because it sounds contradictory to my proposal. The tone of my project is not clear yet.
  2. Encourage me to have a different perspective view on the training data. For example, provide three different models “where data is collected from dramatically different populations”,  to allow a user to choose which training data model they want to be judged with.
  3. Do the work I like to do, while also delivering an engaging and memorable experience for participants should be my goal.

So I started to revise the third thesis proposal edition to adjust properly the central question and final purpose.

17 thoughts on “Quick Reflection: w/ Craig Protzel”

  1. Glad to see you process this – I hope you’ve jumped into the “making” phase – no need to “resubmit” unless it’s for your own benefit – you’ll revisit your proposal questions when you go to present!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *