Skip to content

Noah Dixon

UPDATE OF THE CENTURY

Wow. A lot has happened, and I’ve posted about none of it. So it goes. This is my update/clarification post.

On April 10 I lead a workshop that I developed at Utah State University, with their beginning acting class. The workshop centered around Theatre of the Oppressed, opening with a brief history lesson on Augusto Boal and his theories, and then moving into exercises that got kids on their feet. My primary focus for the workshop was to see how untrained “actors” or audience members would respond to Forum Theatre techniques. I was initially worried that I’d run too long (I had two hours lol, but I’m a rambly anxious mess) so within the slides for the workshop I gave myself the leeway to run a shorter version, focused around Image Theatre techniques. This wasn’t what I initially wanted to do–I thought Forum Theatre was the move, you know?–but it proved fruitful, as it went WAY smoother than expected, with tons of engagement from the kids. Because of this, I was able to run both the Image Theatre and Forum Theatre sections, to great avail, and finish on time. The whole thing was filmed and photographed, thanks to my lovely former professor. All the pictures with me in them are too big to upload here, however.

The beginning acting class in question.

From April 18-25 I was in New York, primarily for cultural rehabilitation. Utah can be a lot for me sometimes. During this time, though, I met with my thesis mentor in person twice–thank you Andrew for indulging me and being content to just get coffee and walk through a park talking–and had several extremely fruitful conversations, both with him and my peers. Andrew seemed intrigued by me and my ideas, and challenged me a lot on aspects I wasn’t thinking about. He made it clear to me that what I was doing with the workshop was very cut and dry, opening with a lecture and then asking for engagement. His primary ask was how I could break this structure to gain engagement from the audience almost involuntarily, before they know that they’re hooked. Andrew and I both come from theatre backgrounds, so his insight into storytelling process/method was invaluable for me, as were the conversations and the connection as a whole. Just from talking to him I learned a lot about the affordances of technology–high or low–in the dramatic process. I went into the conversations with the plan to hybridize my workshop, but this led to a whole new level of intrigue. Initially I wanted to simply use zoom and the tools available there (breakout rooms, screen share, chat), and was trying to figure out how best to do this in an interesting way. Andrew proposed that I add more tools; a shockingly simple but needed prod. Since then I’ve been looking into Miro as a live facilitative tool to add in, in addition to zoom, and other tools. He showed me online gallery spaces, akin to VR but hosted on the web, that I thought might be an interesting further exploration as well. Many more insights came from these conversations; using ringers to perform the scenes, dancers instead of actors (people who know how to be present in the body), and further exploration into the power of Image Theatre, especially in an online setting.

Another poignant point brought up in conversation came from Nun, who–like Andrew–was interested in the unseen affordances that a hybrid format offers to this kind of work. She spoke about using tech/digital tools to increase immersion, subsequently increasing engagement. How can I get the audience to participate? Capture their attention in a “theatrical” way, using the digital tools at my disposal.

At this moment I’m working on my presentation for May 2, and compiling my bibliography/archive. I’ll update with how that goes, and post a final reflective blog post soon.

 

p.s.

 

Life update: I’m selling all of my material possessions on a whim and going to Shanghai on May 9 with the intention of finding a job and staying. Wish me luck!

 

 

Show A Thing Follow Up/Update

Show a Thing was a really good experience for me. It was interesting to get multiple different perspectives on my project and the way it could pan out, and the resources/ideas presented to me were awesome. I steered the conversation with most of the guests towards the digital tool aspect of my proposal, some of the ideas or resources presented to me were:

  • https://www.blasttheory.co.uk/projects/ivy4evr/
  • https://theaterofwar.com/about
  • Streaming a live Theatre of the Oppressed workshop in VR using tools available at NYU Shanghai
  • Streaming Forum Theatre exercises to Twitch using trained actors who take suggestion from the chat
  • Using Zoom as a facilitation tool to do this digitally

And several others. At the moment I’m trying to process all of this information and how it could affect the development of my project, and finishing up the first version of the workshop I’m going to run tomorrow (April 10) at Utah State University.

  • https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1w7vzgVX9byusTtyzThG5j4i37EKW1-z1LAf5hiUzKSE/edit#slide=id.g2146677c621_0_53 (This is the completed version of the workshop. I edited it to include a section on Image Theatre in case I’m short on time, where my prototype only focused on Forum Theatre. I wrote scenes/scenarios for each, and included a bibliography.

From here I plan to edit the workshop based on my findings there, and hopefully adapt it to a semi-digital format to attempt in New York sometime between April 18-25th.

Workable Prototype/Production Schedule/Update

After submitting my original proposal (or maybe even a little before), I was starting to lose sight of what I wanted to say or do with my project; what its form or focus should be. I don’t feel as though I had a lot to individually say in the poetry work I was doing, and wasn’t finding avenues of research that I enjoyed. The ask to resubmit due to lack of specificity came as no surprise. So, to reconcile, I decided it was best to lean on my background in theatre to come up with a project both that I could more passionately pursue, and that falls more in line with my take on “interactive art” in general. What’s followed is an extrapolation on the idea that I shared with Jason and Sehmon in Berlin; an exploration into the techniques and theories of Augusto Boal’s Theatre of the Oppressed. Theatre of the Oppressed is the larger umbrella for various forms of theatre that seek to question the hierarchical power structures present in art and society, the foremost of which is Forum Theatre. Forum Theatre seeks to engage the audience in the performance, challenging their role as spectators and encouraging them to become “spect-actors;” using their critical thinking and problem solving skills to change the course of the established scene towards a more desireable (or less “oppressive”) outcome. The current focus of my research is on this, and how this technique can be relevant in different locales. I’m working on a workshop that I can lead, one that–I hope–succinctly teaches of the history behind Boal’s theories/techniques, and challenges people to get up on their feet and participate in the exercises and discourse. This is what I have so far.

Rough Production Schedule: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Rv93tiiCCGc0cKmJZ_ka161NmDJo4tgnwQ_t7hlZd8

Workshop Prototype: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ynbwIscAvDy_miwYKCM_vPQO49pS42sGbogxBuso308

 

Open question: As I move forward with this research towards the summer, how can I make it my own? I want to make this relevant to the IMA/ITP-sphere, but am at a bit of a loss as to the form my final project could take. Sehmon proposed digital tools that facilitate performing Theatre of the Oppressed/Forum Theatre–which I love but don’t know how to feasibly do. Maybe it’s an exploration on the term “forum” theatre and what that could mean, a la online chat forums? IDK. HELP.

Starter Bibliography

This is just the beginnings, with some references coming from the research Sarah gave me to do and some coming from sources I was already fond of. I’ll be adding to it as I collect more stuff.

3 Pillars of my Thesis:

 

Performance:

https://youtu.be/19HVkeP4lCE (La Dispute, a Departure)

https://youtu.be/vnKZ4pdSU-s (Neil Hilborn, OCD)

Website:

https://www.kalladomcdowell.com/ (K. Allado-Mcdowell’s website)

Published book:

https://www.kalladomcdowell.com/ (K. Allado-Mcdowell’s website again, lower down are some of her book covers. I like them because they’re minimalistic)

https://trollthread.tumblr.com/post/98065833979/i-rl-you-rl-sophia-le-fraga-troll-thread-2014 (Sophie Le Fraga’s I RL, U RL)

 

Peer Meeting #1

Most of my research in the past week has been into generative poetry/computational poetry, and Jason brought up the point of how they’re never generating fully from nothing, there are building blocks that were inserted by the creator of the piece. That brought to mind the question of what my building blocks would be; what I could put together to help create something in a generative setting. What are the building blocks that make up my art? That’s the question I want to tackle this week.

1-1 Reflection

I’ve got a lot to look into! My sphere of reference really ignores computational poetry and a lot of modern poetry in general, and now I have a lot of references to look into. I think we narrowed down three arms of what I want my project to be, those being: a book, a website, and a performance. What shape those three things will end up taking is something we’ll have to discover over the course of the coming weeks, but I’m optimistic that this is the direction I want to be looking in. Going to write a few analysis about some of the pieces I’ve been referred to, and work on the Dream Review/Nothing to Something exercises.